Get genuinely good at working with Claude.
Most people use Claude like a smarter search box. That's the shallow end. This guide walks you from "what even is this" to running your own automated workflows - no computer science degree required.
Read it top to bottom the first time, then keep it as a reference. Each section is tagged with a level so you can stop wherever your needs stop - Level 1 is for everyone, Level 2 is for people who want to get real work off their plate, and Level 3 involves a little light setup (nothing scary, and we explain every term). When you're ready to put this to work on real tasks, its companion, the Playbook, is full of copyable recipes.
The gap between people who find Claude "kind of useful" and people who find it transformative is almost never intelligence or technical skill. It's knowing which tool to reach for and how to ask. That's learnable in an afternoon. This is that afternoon.
01 - Foundations
How Claude actually works L1
You don't need to understand the engine to drive the car. But knowing a few things about the engine explains almost every weird thing Claude does - and turns "why did it do that?" into "ah, of course."
It predicts, it doesn't look up
Claude is a large language model (LLM). During training it read an enormous amount of text and learned the patterns of how language, ideas, and reasoning fit together. When you ask it something, it isn't retrieving an answer from a database - it's generating a response one piece at a time, each piece chosen because it's the most sensible continuation of everything so far.
This one fact explains a lot:
- It's brilliant at anything language-shaped - drafting, summarizing, translating, explaining, reformatting, brainstorming, reasoning through a problem. This is its home turf.
- It can sound completely confident and still be wrong. This is called a hallucination. Because it's generating plausible text, a made-up statistic can look exactly as fluent as a real one. Always verify facts, figures, names, quotes, and citations.
- By default it doesn't know today's news or anything private to you. Its knowledge stops at a training cutoff date, and it can't see your email, your files, or the live web - unless you give it a way to. That "way" is web search, connectors, and uploads, which we cover later.
Think of Claude as an exceptionally well-read, quick-thinking colleague who has been asleep since its training cutoff, can't see your screen, and will earnestly guess rather than say "I don't know" unless you make it safe to do so. Give it context, give it tools, and ask it to flag uncertainty - and it gets dramatically more reliable.
The context window is its working memory
Everything in your current conversation - your messages, its replies, any files you've attached - sits in what's called the context window. Think of it as the desk Claude is working at. It's large, but not infinite. When a conversation gets extremely long, the earliest things can effectively slide off the desk, and Claude may start to lose the thread.
The practical takeaway: a focused conversation beats a sprawling one. More on when to start fresh in section 03.
It's a mirror for your input
The single biggest lever you control is the quality and specificity of what you put in. A vague question gets a generic answer; a specific, well-framed request with examples gets something genuinely useful. That's not a limitation - it's the whole skill, and it's the next section.
02 - The essentials
Getting started: the core habits L1
If you take nothing else from this guide, take these. They're the difference between a party trick and a tool you rely on.
1. Give it a role, a goal, and the guardrails
The most reliable prompt formula isn't magic words - it's just telling Claude what you'd tell a capable new hire: who to be, what you want, and what "good" looks like.
- Role / context - "You're helping me, a marketing manager, prep for a client meeting."
- The actual task - "Draft a one-page agenda."
- Constraints & format - "Keep it under 200 words, use bullet points, professional but warm tone."
2. Show it an example
If you want output in a particular shape - a certain email style, a table layout, a tone - paste an example of one you like. Claude is exceptional at matching a pattern. One good example is worth a paragraph of description.
3. Treat it like a conversation, not a vending machine
The first answer is a draft, not a verdict. Push back: "shorter," "more skeptical," "you missed the budget angle," "rewrite the third paragraph." Iterating in a thread is where the quality actually comes from - most people quit one turn too early.
4. Ask it to think, or to ask
For anything complex, two phrases do a lot of work: "Think it through step by step before answering," and "Ask me any clarifying questions before you start." The second one is a cheat code - it turns a guessing game into a briefing.
What good and bad prompts actually look like
Same underlying need. Watch what specificity does.
You don't need to write a mini-essay every time. The habit is simply: before you hit enter, ask yourself "have I told it enough that a smart stranger could do this task?" If not, add the missing piece. That's 90% of prompting.
Go beyond "answer my question"
The leap from casual to power user is realizing Claude does whole categories of work, not just Q&A. A starter menu:
- Transform - turn a messy transcript into clean meeting notes; a spreadsheet into a summary; a dense report into three bullet points.
- Draft - first versions of emails, docs, proposals, job descriptions, tricky replies. Getting to a rough draft is the slow part; Claude erases it.
- Think with you - "poke holes in this plan," "argue the opposite side," "what am I not considering?"
- Learn - "explain this like I'm smart but new to it," "quiz me on this material," "walk me through this contract clause by clause."
- Do multi-step work - with the right setup (later sections), it can pull from your tools and complete a whole task, not just talk about it.
03 - A common question
One thread or a new one? L1
Almost everyone gets this slightly wrong at first - either cramming a month of unrelated questions into one endless chat, or starting fresh so often they re-explain themselves constantly. Here's the rule.
Keep the same thread while the topic and context stay the same. Start a new one when the subject genuinely changes. A thread is a train of thought - keep it on the rails.
Stay in the thread when…
- You're iterating on the same piece of work - refining a draft, going deeper on one analysis.
- The earlier back-and-forth is useful context Claude should keep in mind.
- You're building something up over several steps.
Start a new thread when…
- You've switched to a completely unrelated task. (Old context becomes clutter - and can even bleed into the new answer.)
- The conversation has gotten very long and Claude seems to be "forgetting" or drifting. A fresh start with a quick summary often works better than fighting a bloated thread.
- You want a clean, unbiased take unaffected by everything said above.
Why this works differently in Chat vs. Code
The principle is the same, but the stakes differ, and it's worth knowing why.
| In Claude Chat | In Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| What a thread holds | The conversation and any files you attached. | The conversation plus everything it has read and done in your project - files, commands, results. |
| Cost of a long thread | Answers may drift; easy to just start over. | The working memory fills with old file contents and steps, which crowds out room for the current task and can slow it down. |
| When to reset | New topic, or it's clearly lost the plot. | Start a fresh session for each distinct task or feature. Between big tasks, resetting keeps it sharp and focused on what's in front of it. |
| Carrying context over | Paste a short recap into the new chat, or use a Project (section 05). | It re-reads the actual files, so it re-grounds itself quickly. A brief "here's what we're doing" still helps. |
In Chat, a stale thread mostly costs you quality. In Code, a stale session also costs you focus and speed, because it's juggling real files and actions. Both reward the same instinct: one thread per train of thought.
04 - Know your tools
Chat vs. Cowork vs. Code L1L2
These are three different ways to work with the same underlying Claude. Picking the right one for the task is one of the most useful things you'll learn here.
| Surface | What it is | Reach for it when… |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Chat | The classic conversation - you type, it responds. Available on the web and in the desktop and mobile apps. | You want to think, write, learn, or get a quick answer. The everyday workhorse. Start here for anything conversational. |
| Cowork | Claude working as an agent - it can take multiple steps on its own, use your connected tools, and complete an actual task, all without you writing any code. | You want to delegate a whole job, not just have a conversation: "pull this week's numbers from our tools and draft the update," "process these files and file the results." Multi-step work done for you. |
| Claude Code | A powerful agent that works in a folder on your computer. It reads and changes files, runs programs, and remembers how you work. It runs inside the desktop app, which looks and feels like Chat, or in your terminal if you prefer that. | You want Claude working on real files that stay on your machine, with standing instructions it follows every time. The most capable surface, and the only one that keeps your setup between sessions. |
Think of it as a spectrum of how much you're handing over. Chat = you drive, Claude advises. Cowork = you delegate, Claude executes across your tools without code. Code = you delegate the most, with the most power and a folder it keeps coming back to. The magic ingredients - Projects, Skills, and Connectors - make all three better.
Claude Code has a name that scares people off, and the usual description ("runs in your terminal") makes it sound like a developer tool. Both undersell it. You can open Claude Code inside the desktop app, where it looks much like Chat, and point it at any ordinary folder: a job search, a budget, a set of meeting notes, a book you're writing.
What makes it different from Chat is not that it writes code. It's that it works in a real folder that persists. Chat forgets everything when the thread ends. Claude Code opens the same folder tomorrow, reads the notes you left it, and picks up where you stopped. Three things follow from that:
- It reads and edits your actual files, in place. Not "paste the document in, copy the answer out." It opens the spreadsheet, changes the rows, and saves it.
- Standing instructions stick. You write down how you work once, in a file it reads every time, and stop re-explaining yourself at the start of every conversation. (That's a Skill and a project file, covered in §06.)
- It handles many steps without supervision. "Go through these 40 files, pull out every date, and build me one summary" is a single request, not forty.
Desktop app vs. web browser L1
Chat and Cowork both run in a web browser and in a downloadable desktop app. Same account, same conversations synced between them - so which should you use?
| Desktop app | Web browser | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Daily, serious use. It feels like a real application - always a click away, its own window, better keyboard shortcuts. | Quick access, borrowed or locked-down computers, or when you simply don't want to install anything. |
| Working with your stuff | Integrates more deeply with your computer - easier file access and richer connections to local tools and connectors. | Great for uploads and cloud connectors; more limited in reaching into your machine. |
| Staying in flow | Won't get lost in a sea of browser tabs; can stay open and ready in the background. | Lives with everything else you have open - convenient, but easy to lose. |
| Setup | A one-time download and sign-in. | None - just log in. |
If you use Claude on a daily basis or even just a couple times a week, I highly recommend using the desktop app, as it has better functionality and is easier to access than having to open a browser tab.
05 - Stop repeating yourself
Projects L2
A Project is a dedicated workspace in Claude Chat that remembers your context so you never have to re-explain it. If you find yourself pasting the same background into chat after chat, this is the fix.
What a Project actually is
Two things bundled together, shared across every conversation you start inside that Project:
- Custom instructions - standing directions for how Claude should behave here. ("You're my brand's copy assistant. Always use British spelling. Never use exclamation marks. Our tone is dry and understated.")
- Knowledge / files - reference material you upload once: style guides, product docs, past examples, a spreadsheet of facts. Claude can draw on all of it in any chat within the Project.
Why they're worth it
- No more re-briefing. Every chat starts already knowing your context.
- Consistency. Outputs stay on-tone and on-brand because the rules live in one place.
- Organization. All the chats for one client, initiative, or area of your life live together instead of scattered across your history.
When to create one
Make a Project whenever a topic is recurring and carries reusable context. Good candidates: a specific client, an ongoing initiative, "my writing," a course you're taking, a product you own. Skip it for genuine one-offs - a normal chat is fine for those.
- Create the Project
In Claude Chat, create a new Project and give it a clear name.
- Write custom instructions
Describe the role, the rules, the tone, and anything Claude should always keep in mind. This is where you encode "how we do things here."
- Add knowledge
Upload the reference files and examples Claude should rely on. Add to this over time as you find yourself wishing it "just knew" something.
- Work inside it
Start your chats from within the Project. Each one inherits the instructions and knowledge automatically - you just get to work.
Create one Project called "My writing". In the instructions, describe your voice and paste two or three things you've written that sound like you. From then on, every draft you ask for in that Project comes back already sounding like you - not like a generic AI. (More on this in section 07.)
06 - Teach it once, reuse forever
Skills L2L3
A Skill is a saved set of instructions that teaches Claude how to do a specific, repeatable task your way. Where a Project holds context, a Skill holds a procedure - and Claude pulls it up automatically when it's relevant.
First: what's an "MD file"?
Skills are written in a file format called Markdown - the file ends in .md. Don't let the tech-y name put you off. A Markdown file is just a plain text file with a few simple formatting rules:
# Headingmakes a heading.**bold**makes text bold.- A line starting with
-makes a bullet point.
That's basically it. You can open, read, and edit an .md file in any text editor - the free Notes-style apps that come with your computer, or a code editor. It's the same plain writing you already do; Markdown is just the lightweight way of marking what's a heading and what's a bullet. Claude reads and writes Markdown fluently, which is why Skills use it.
Anatomy of a Skill
A Skill is a Markdown file (conventionally named SKILL.md) with two parts: a short label at the very top, then the instructions below it.
--- name: weekly-report description: Turn my raw notes into our team's weekly status format. Use when I paste notes and ask for a weekly update. --- # Weekly Report When I give you raw notes, produce an update with: 1. **Shipped** - what got done, one line each 2. **In progress** - with a status 3. **Blockers** - what's stuck and who can help Keep it under 200 words. Plain language, no jargon.
The label is the bit between the two rows of dashes. The dashes do nothing clever; they just mark where the label starts and stops. Inside it you write two lines:
- name - what you're calling the skill.
- description - a one-line summary of what it does and when to use it. This part matters enormously: it's how Claude decides, on its own, when to reach for this Skill. Write it the way you'd describe the task to a coworker.
Everything below the label is the actual instruction manual - as detailed as you like.
If you go looking for more on Skills elsewhere, you'll see this label called frontmatter. Same thing, and you never have to use the word.
How to create one with Claude
You've now seen what a Skill looks like, which is useful for reading one. Don't write one by hand. Have Claude write it, and spend your effort on telling it what good looks like.
That last sentence is the one that does the work. Without it you get a Skill built from whatever Claude assumed. With it, Claude interviews you first, and the questions are usually the ones you'd have forgotten to answer: what format do you want, who reads this, what should it never do, what does a good one look like versus a bad one.
- Answer the questions properly
This is where the quality comes from. Vague answers make a vague Skill. If you have a past example of the task done well, paste it in.
- Let Claude write the file
It produces the whole
SKILL.md, label and all. Read it once and check it sounds like how you'd explain the task to a new hire. Anything that reads wrong, say so and have it revise. - Put it where Claude can reach it
Chat and Code each have their own spot for this. Both are covered just below.
- Run it on a real task, then fix it
The first version is rarely right. Use it on actual work, tell Claude what was off, and have it update the Skill. A Skill you've corrected three times is worth more than one you wrote perfectly in theory.
If the steps live in a doc, an email, or an old checklist, paste it in and say "turn this into a Skill." Starting from something real beats starting from a blank file.
Using Skills in Chat
- Upload it
In Claude Chat's settings, find the Skills section and add your Skill (or its folder). This makes it available to your conversations.
- Let it fire automatically
Because you wrote a good
description, Claude recognizes when a task matches and applies the Skill on its own. Paste your notes and say "weekly update," and it follows your recipe. - Or invoke it directly
You can also call a Skill by name to be explicit - for example, many surfaces let you type a slash command like
/weekly-report. Either way, Claude runs your saved procedure instead of improvising.
Using Skills in Code L3
Claude Code uses the same Skills, just stored in a specific place. You put each skill in a folder inside a .claude/skills/ directory - either in your project (so it's specific to that project) or in your home folder (so it's available everywhere).
.claude/
skills/
weekly-report/
SKILL.md # the skill itself
release-notes/
SKILL.md
Once a Skill lives there, Claude Code discovers it automatically and - just like in Chat - either applies it when the task matches the description, or runs it when you invoke it by name (e.g. /weekly-report). The .claude/skills/ folder is the only new idea; the Skill file is identical to the one you'd use in Chat.
Skills are how you stop re-teaching Claude the same task. Write down "how I like this done" once, and every future request - across Chat, Cowork, and Code - follows your standard automatically. This is the moment Claude goes from assistant to teammate.
07 - Personalization
Make Claude sound like you L1L2
The best part of using Claude over time: it stops feeling generic. You can teach it your voice, your standards, and your preferences once - so you stop re-explaining "keep it brief, non-technical, no em-dashes" every single time.
Out of the box, Claude writes in a competent but neutral, faintly corporate voice - the "AI voice" everyone can spot. Getting past that isn't about a magic prompt. It's about giving Claude a durable sense of who you are and how you like things, and storing that in the right place.
Show, don't tell - the fastest lever
Whatever method you use, the single most effective way to teach your voice is examples. Paste two or three things you've actually written and say "match this voice." Claude is far better at copying a real sample than interpreting adjectives like "professional but warm." Even better, turn your samples into reusable rules:
Paste 3–5 things you've written and ask: "What are the consistent rules of my style - tone, structure, word choices, things I avoid? Write them as a set of preferences I can save." Now your voice is written down, in Claude's words, ready to store wherever it belongs below.
Match the preference to the right home
There are a few places to store "how I like things," and the trick is matching the scope of a preference to the right one. A universal rule shouldn't live inside one Skill; a niche deliverable's format shouldn't clog your global settings.
| If the preference is… | Store it in… | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A universal rule for everything you do | Profile preferences (settings) | "Never use em-dashes. Default to plain, non-technical language." |
| A fact about you Claude should just know | Memory | "I'm a product manager; my updates go to a non-technical exec audience." |
| The context + rules for one area or client | A Project (§05) | "For Acme: British spelling, formal tone, here's their brand guide." |
| The exact recipe + voice for one recurring deliverable | A Skill (§06) | "My exec release recap: ~350 words, no bug fixes, lead with who it impacts." |
1. Profile preferences - the global baseline L1
In Claude's settings there's a place for standing instructions that apply to every conversation. This is home for your always-true rules - tone, formatting, pet peeves. Set "keep it brief, non-technical, no em-dashes" once here and it follows you everywhere, no Project or Skill required. If you do one thing from this section, do this.
2. Memory - and its two different flavors
"Memory" means two different things depending on where you're working, and it's worth not mixing them up:
- In Claude Chat (the browser, the mobile app, or the desktop app): Claude can build up a memory of you across conversations, so useful facts and preferences carry forward without you repeating them. You can nudge it directly: "remember that I prefer bullet points over paragraphs." This is the automatic, no-setup kind. (Exactly how it works varies by product and plan, so where you have it, lean on it.)
- In Claude Code: memory is a set of plain files you control, not something it learns on its own. Claude Code reads a project memory file and a global one in your home folder every time it starts (often a
memory.md, alongside aCLAUDE.mdthat holds project instructions), so your standing facts and rules are always in front of it. Same goal, but here you write and edit the memory yourself.
3. Projects - personalization scoped to an area
A Project (§05) shapes every chat inside it with its own instructions and knowledge. Perfect when your voice or rules change by context - one client wants formal, another wants breezy, your personal writing is different again.
4. Skills - bottle a specific deliverable's voice
When a particular thing you produce has its own exact standard, a Skill (§06) captures not just the steps but the voice and the rules. This is the most precise form of "sound like me," and it travels - you can share the Skill so a whole team's output matches.
Take a recurring executive update email. The preferences that make it yours might be: high-level only (no bug fixes, no technical detail), brief (~350 words), lead with who the change impacts most, written for a non-technical audience, no em-dashes, themed headers, bold lead-in bullets. That's seven specific rules you'd otherwise repeat every month. Captured once as a Skill, you just say "draft the exec recap from these release notes" and it comes back sounding like you wrote it - because, in effect, you did. The rules are yours; Claude just follows them.
Keep teaching it
Personalization compounds. Every time Claude gets something wrong, don't just fix it in the moment - decide where the correction belongs. A one-off? Just say it. A forever rule? Add it to your profile. Specific to one deliverable? Update the Skill. Treat those corrections as deposits: a little effort now, paid back every future time.
08 - Give Claude hands
Connectors & MCPs L2L3
By default Claude can't see your Slack, your email, your files, or your company's data. Connectors change that. They're the bridges that let Claude read from - and sometimes act in - the tools you already use.
Connector, MCP - what's the difference?
Mostly just vocabulary. MCP (Model Context Protocol) is the open standard - the shared "language" that lets Claude plug into an outside tool. A connector is a friendly, ready-made MCP connection you can turn on with a click. So: all connectors are MCPs under the hood; "connector" is just the polished, no-setup version. When someone says "add the Slack MCP," they mean "connect Slack."
A connector grants Claude access to real data and sometimes the ability to act (send a message, edit a record). Only connect tools you trust, review the permissions you're granting, and start with read-only access when you can. Treat it like giving a new assistant a key to a system - deliberately.
Kind 1 - Connectors already in Claude's directory L2
Claude ships with a built-in directory of popular connectors - the likes of Slack, Gmail, Google Drive, Google Calendar, and more. These are the easy ones: no technical setup, just sign in and approve.
- Open the connectors directory
In Claude's settings, go to Connectors and browse what's available.
- Pick one and connect
Click Connect on, say, Gmail. You'll be taken to a familiar sign-in screen for that service.
- Approve the access
The service asks whether to let Claude in, and shows what it'll be able to do. Review it, approve, and you're bounced back to Claude. This standard "sign in and approve" handshake is called OAuth - the same thing that happens when one app asks to use your Google login.
- Use it in conversation
Now you can say "search my inbox for the contract from Acme" or "what's on my calendar Thursday?" and Claude actually goes and looks.
Kind 2 - Connecting a vendor's own MCP L3
Not every tool is in the directory. Many software vendors now offer their own MCP server that you connect to manually. A content-management platform like Hygraph, for example, exposes an MCP so Claude can query your CMS data directly. Connecting one is a little more hands-on, but it's the same idea, and it's very doable.
You'll typically need two things from the vendor:
- The server address (URL)
The vendor publishes an MCP endpoint - a web address, usually in their docs, that looks something like
https://api.your-vendor.com/mcp. That's where Claude will connect. - An access token
Because this is your private data, the vendor needs to know it's really you. You generate a token in that tool's settings - often called an API key or a Personal Access Token (PAT). Think of it as a long, secret password made specifically for apps to use on your behalf.
- Add a custom connector in Claude
In Claude's Connectors settings, choose to add a custom connector, then paste in the server URL and the token where prompted.
- Test it
Ask Claude something only that tool would know - "list the last five entries in my CMS." A real answer means you're connected.
An access token / API key is a credential. Don't paste it into random chats, don't share it, don't commit it into a file that gets shared or backed up publicly. Store it somewhere safe (a password manager is ideal), and if a tool lets you scope a token to read-only or to expire, do it.
Connectors are what turn Cowork and Code from "smart writer" into "does the actual job." Connect your data sources and task tools, and Claude can pull real numbers, draft from real context, and complete work end to end - the difference between "help me write the update" and "write the update from this week's real data."
09 - Right tool, right job
Choosing a model L1L2
Claude comes in a few models. They trade off speed and cost against raw capability. The names change as new versions ship - but the tiers have stayed remarkably stable, so learn the tiers and you'll never be lost.
Haiku
The quickest and most economical. Handles straightforward tasks with very low latency.
Sonnet
Strong reasoning at a sensible speed. The sweet spot for the vast majority of real work.
Opus
The deepest reasoning and best judgment on genuinely hard, nuanced, or multi-step problems. Slower and more expensive.
Default to the balanced tier (Sonnet). Drop to the fast tier (Haiku) when speed matters more than depth. Reach for the top tier (Opus) when the problem is hard and getting it right matters most. This logic outlives any specific version number.
Model names move fast, so treat this as a snapshot, not gospel: the latest generation is the Claude 5 family - Opus 5 (top tier) and Sonnet 5 (balanced) - alongside Haiku 4.5 (fast). There are also specialized and newer point-releases beyond these. When in doubt, pick the newest model in the tier you want, and check the model selector for what's current. This is the section most likely to age - update it as new models land.
A few practical notes
- You can switch mid-conversation. Draft with a fast model, then switch to the top tier for the one hard question.
- Better prompting often beats a bigger model. A clear prompt to Sonnet frequently outperforms a lazy prompt to Opus. Section 02 is cheaper than an upgrade.
- For agents doing long, multi-step work (Cowork, Code), the top tier's judgment usually pays for itself - a small mistake early can cascade through many steps.
10 - Keep this bit
The one-page recap
Everything above, compressed to what you'll actually remember.
- It predicts, it doesn't look up. Great with language, can be confidently wrong, and only knows what you or its tools give it. Verify facts.
- Specificity is the whole game. Role + goal + constraints + an example. If a smart stranger couldn't do the task from your prompt, add more.
- Iterate - don't accept the first draft. And ask it to think step by step, or to ask you questions first.
- One thread per train of thought. New topic → new chat. This matters even more in Code, where sessions carry real work.
- Pick the right surface. Chat to think and write · Cowork to delegate multi-step work without code · Code for technical, hands-on power. Install the desktop app if you're using it daily.
- Projects save your context so you stop re-explaining. Skills save your procedures so you stop re-teaching. Connectors give Claude access to your real tools and data.
- Teach it your voice once. Global rules (no jargon, no em-dashes) go in your profile preferences; a specific deliverable's style goes in a Skill. Stop re-explaining how you like things.
- Models: default to balanced (Sonnet), go fast (Haiku) for speed, go top (Opus) for hard problems.
There's no single "right" way to use Claude - the point is that there are many. A quick answer, a thinking partner, a tireless drafter, a workflow that runs itself. The people who get the most from it are simply the ones who learned to reach for the right mode at the right moment. Now you're one of them. When you're ready to turn this into real, hands-off workflows, head to the Playbook.
Part 2 of 2 · Put it to work
The Claude Playbook